Wisconsin and NIL Collective File Lawsuit Against Miami Over Alleged Tampering

Jun 20 2025

The University of Wisconsin and its NIL collective, VC Connect, have taken legal action against the University of Miami, alleging that Miami knowingly enticed one of Wisconsin's football players to abandon a lucrative name, image, and likeness (NIL) contract to join their team for the upcoming season.

This lawsuit, filed in Wisconsin state court, spans 23 pages and marks a significant escalation in allegations of tampering within college athletics. The outcome could reshape the landscape of NIL agreements across the collegiate sports realm.

Identified only as "Student-Athlete A" in the lawsuit, the player at the center of this controversy is believed to be cornerback Xavier Lucas. Lucas announced his intention to enter the transfer portal last December.

Following this announcement, Darren Heitner, Lucas's representative, claimed that Wisconsin was obstructing Lucas's entry into the portal, thereby limiting his communication with other institutions. By January, Heitner confirmed that Lucas would be transferring to Miami.

This situation highlights the ongoing upheaval in college athletics, driven by two pivotal changes: athletes gaining the right to transfer more freely and a 2021 NCAA ruling that allows them to secure NIL endorsement deals worth millions. These developments have significantly altered recruitment dynamics and raised questions about contractual obligations.

"Indeed, student-athletes' newfound NIL rights will be rendered meaningless if third parties are allowed to induce student-athletes to abandon their contractual commitments," states a section of the lawsuit.

Wisconsin claims it possesses credible evidence that Miami and Lucas engaged in improper communication prior to his transfer decision. The lawsuit asserts that the inducement for Lucas to join Miami occurred shortly after he entered into an NIL agreement with Wisconsin, resulting in considerable financial and reputational damage for the university.

The legal action seeks unspecified monetary damages and a declaration that Miami's actions towards Student-Athlete A constituted tampering.

A request for comment from the University of Miami went unanswered. Heitner declined to discuss the lawsuit but confirmed that Lucas remains committed to attending Miami and playing football.

Wisconsin has expressed strong support from its leadership and the Big Ten Conference in pursuing this lawsuit, emphasizing its dedication to maintaining integrity and fairness in college athletics.

"While we reluctantly bring this case, we stand by our position that respecting and enforcing contractual obligations is essential to maintaining a level playing field," Wisconsin stated. "In addition to our legal action, we will continue to be proactive in protecting the interests of our student-athletes, our program, and the broader collegiate athletics community."

Lucas, hailing from Pompano Beach, Florida, recorded 12 tackles, an interception, and a sack during his freshman season at Wisconsin.

Heitner noted that Lucas has not received any compensation from Wisconsin, thus he owes no financial obligations to the school. He also contended that Wisconsin violated NCAA bylaws by failing to enter Lucas into the transfer database within two business days of his request.

Wisconsin previously stated that it did not place Lucas's name in the portal due to his binding two-year NIL agreement.

Recent high-profile transfers, such as brothers Nico and Madden Iamaleava moving from Tennessee to UCLA, have reignited discussions about contracts and buyout clauses. Nico Iamaleava left behind a reported $2.4 million NIL contract after leading Tennessee to the College Football Playoff last season. Meanwhile, Madden Iamaleava entered the portal following spring practices after signing a contract valued at $500,000 with Arkansas.

Arkansas athletic director Hunter Yurachek has voiced support for efforts by the Razorbacks' NIL collective to enforce buyout clauses in athlete contracts.

What do you think?

👍 0
👎 0
🔥 0
😊 0
💩 0
😍 0
😤 0